HomeDecision matrix

Managed vs self-hosted

Last reviewed: 2026-08-06

Both approaches are legitimate. Self-hosting gives you full control over hardware, data, and configuration. Managed hosting removes operational work in exchange for a fixed price. This page compares the concrete differences; which is better depends on your team and your requirements.

DimensionManaged (HostAgentics Cloud)Self-hosted
Setup timeMinutes — pay, deploy, use. No servers or config.Hours to days — servers, Docker, databases, TLS, reverse proxy.
Expertise requiredNone. Infrastructure is handled for you.System administration, containers, networking, security patching.
Pricing modelFixed monthly price; no infrastructure overages.Pay your cloud provider for compute, storage, and bandwidth you use.
BackupsDaily provider snapshots with 7-day retention and dashboard restore.You design and operate your own backup process.
UpdatesStable-channel updates tested and applied automatically with rollback protection.You track and apply upstream releases yourself.
MonitoringHealth monitoring with automatic restart included.You build or buy monitoring yourself.
Data controlData lives in your isolated runtime; you can export it.Full physical control of your hardware and data.
Cost predictabilityPredictable; scales by adding plans or Resource Boost.Variable; depends on usage patterns.

When Managed (HostAgentics Cloud) may be the better fit

Self-hosting is likely the better fit when you have an operations team, strict data-residency requirements beyond what managed hosting offers, or unusual hardware/scale needs. Managed hosting is the better fit when your priority is time-to-value, predictable cost, and no infrastructure workload.

Sources

Facts and pricing change; this comparison reflects publicly available information at the review date and does not constitute an endorsement.

Managed vs self-hosted AI agents · HostAgentics